How to Contribute

The Legal Ops Kit is a living document, and the most valuable improvements come from practitioners using it. Corrections, missing examples, "this didn't work for us" notes, regional or jurisdiction-specific nuance — all of it makes the kit more useful for the next person landing on a chapter under pressure.

Suggesting an edit

Every page has an Edit in Notion button at the top. Clicking it opens the page in Notion as a publicly readable view, where you can leave inline comments on any paragraph, table, or callout.

The flow:

1. Read the chapter on the site.
2. Click Edit in Notion at the top of the page.
3. The page opens in Notion. Scroll to the section you want to comment on.
4. Highlight the text, click the comment icon, and write your suggestion or correction.
5. Submit. Comments reach the editorial team, and approved changes get merged back into the source.

You'll need a Notion account

Notion requires you to be signed in to comment. If you don't have an account, you can create one free at notion.so — it takes about 30 seconds and works for any Notion-published kit. We don't get access to your workspace; only your name and the comments you leave on these pages.

Prefer not to create a Notion account? Email suggestions directly to info@tilt.legal.

What makes a good contribution

• Corrections. Factual errors, broken links, outdated regulation references, stale benchmarks — flag them.
• Missing examples. "We tried this and it broke because…" examples are gold. Real-world failure modes belong in In the Trenches sections — the kit gets stronger every time one's added.
• Jurisdiction-specific nuance. The kit leans Australian and UK in places. If a framework lands differently in your region — different regulators, different market norms, different vendor landscape — tell us how.
• Tool or vendor updates. The legal tech market shifts fast. Vendor renames, new entrants, deprecated products, and pricing-model changes are all worth flagging.
• Better checklists. If a chapter's checklist would be more useful with two extra items or one fewer, say so and explain why.

What we tend not to merge

• Vendor promotion or marketing copy.
• Personal opinions presented as best practice without supporting reasoning or evidence.
• Edits that materially change a chapter's framing or thesis. Those are conversations, not comments — reach out directly.

Proposing something bigger

For a substantial change — a new chapter, major restructure, guest In the Trenches piece, or new appendix or template — leave a high-level comment on the most relevant page or email info@tilt.legal. We're particularly interested in contributions that close gaps: specific industries, smaller in-house teams, the Asia-Pacific market beyond Australia, the buy-side perspective on legal vendors.

Thanks for helping make this kit better.