The Legal Ops Kit is a living document, and the most valuable improvements come from the practitioners who actually use it. Corrections, missing examples, *"this didn't work for us"* notes, regional or jurisdiction-specific nuance — all of it makes the kit more useful for the next person who lands on a chapter under pressure.
## Suggesting an edit
Every page on the site has an **Edit in Notion** button at the top. Clicking it opens that page in Notion as a publicly readable view, where you can leave inline comments on any paragraph, table, or callout.
The flow:
1. Read the chapter on the site.
2. Click **Edit in Notion** at the top of the page.
3. The page opens in Notion in your browser. Scroll to the section you'd like to comment on.
4. Highlight the text, click the comment icon that appears, and write your suggestion or correction.
5. Submit. Comments come through to the editorial team and approved changes are merged back into the source.
## You'll need a Notion account
Notion requires you to be signed in to leave comments. If you don't already have an account, you can create one free at [notion.so](http://notion.so) — it takes about 30 seconds and works for any Notion-published kit you contribute to. We don't get access to your Notion workspace; only your name and the comments you choose to leave on these pages.
If you'd prefer not to create a Notion account, you can email suggestions directly to the editorial team at [info@tilt.legal](mailto:info@tilt.legal).
## What makes a good contribution
- **Corrections.** Factual errors, broken links, outdated regulation references, stale benchmarks — flag them.
- **Missing examples.** *"We tried this and it broke because…"* examples are gold. Real-world failure modes belong in *In the Trenches* sections, and the kit gets stronger every time one is added.
- **Jurisdiction-specific nuance.** The kit leans Australian and UK in places. If a framework lands differently in your region — different regulators, different market norms, different vendor landscape — tell us how.
- **Tool or vendor updates.** The legal tech market shifts quickly. Vendor renames, new entrants, deprecated products, and pricing-model changes are all worth noting.
- **Better checklists.** If a chapter's end-of-chapter checklist would be more useful with two extra items or one fewer, say so and explain why.
## What we tend not to merge
- Vendor promotion or marketing copy.
- Personal opinions presented as best practice without supporting reasoning or evidence.
- Edits that materially change a chapter's framing or thesis. Those are conversations, not comments — reach out directly so we can discuss.
## Proposing something bigger
If you'd like to propose a substantial change — a new chapter, a major restructure, a guest *In the Trenches* piece, a new appendix or template — leave a high-level comment on the most relevant existing page or email the editorial team at [info@tilt.legal](mailto:info@tilt.legal). We're particularly interested in contributions that close gaps in the current kit (specific industries, smaller in-house teams, the Asia-Pacific market beyond Australia, the buy-side perspective on legal vendors).
Thanks for helping make this kit better.